Tailored Chemotherapy Information Faxed to General Practitioners Improves Confidence in Managing Adverse Effects and Satisfaction With Shared Care: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
- 10 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (14) , 2272-2277
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.14.7710
Abstract
Purpose General practitioners (GPs) play a critical role in the treatment of patients with cancer; yet often lack information for optimal care. We developed standardized information for GPs about chemotherapy (CT). In a randomized controlled trial we assessed the impact of sending, by fax, information tailored to the particular patient's CT regimen. Primary end points were: confidence treating patients who were receiving CT (confidence), knowledge of adverse effects and reasons to refer the patient to the treatment center (knowledge), and satisfaction with information and shared care of patients (satisfaction). Methods Focus group work informed the development of the CT information which focused on potential adverse effects and recommended management strategies. GPs of patients due to commence CT were randomly assigned to receive usual correspondence with or without the faxed patient/regimen-specific information. Telephone questionnaire at baseline and 1 week postintervention assessed knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction. Results Ninety-seven GPs managed 97 patients receiving 23 types of CT. Eighty-one (83.5%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. GPs in the intervention group demonstrated a significantly greater increase in confidence (mean difference, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47) and satisfaction (mean difference, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.88) compared with usual care, reflecting a 7.1% and 10.5% difference in score, respectively. No differences were detected for knowledge. GPs receiving the CT sheet found correspondence significantly more useful (P < .001) and instructive (P < .001) than GPs who received standard correspondence alone. Conclusion Information about CT faxed to GPs is a simple, inexpensive intervention that increases confidence managing CT adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care. This intervention could have widespread application.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carersFamily Practice, 2006
- Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospitalQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Oncology service correspondence: Do we communicate?Australasian Radiology, 2003
- The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routineScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2000
- Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care: What are the expectations and how are they met?Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 1998
- Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Do Clinicians Tell Each Other Enough? An Analysis of Referral Communications in Two SpecialtiesFamily Practice, 1994
- Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain?BMJ, 1992
- Paediatric oncology information pack for general practitionersBMJ, 1988
- Combined computer generated discharge documents and surgical audit.BMJ, 1986