Prescription Drug Cost Sharing
Top Cited Papers
- 4 July 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 298 (1) , 61-69
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.1.61
Abstract
ContextPrescription drugs are instrumental to managing and preventing chronic disease. Recent changes in US prescription drug cost sharing could affect access to them.ObjectiveTo synthesize published evidence on the associations among cost-sharing features of prescription drug benefits and use of prescription drugs, use of nonpharmaceutical services, and health outcomes.Data SourcesWe searched PubMed for studies published in English between 1985 and 2006.Study Selection and Data ExtractionAmong 923 articles found in the search, we identified 132 articles examining the associations between prescription drug plan cost-containment measures, including co-payments, tiering, or coinsurance (n = 65), pharmacy benefit caps or monthly prescription limits (n = 11), formulary restrictions (n = 41), and reference pricing (n = 16), and salient outcomes, including pharmacy utilization and spending, medical care utilization and spending, and health outcomes.ResultsIncreased cost sharing is associated with lower rates of drug treatment, worse adherence among existing users, and more frequent discontinuation of therapy. For each 10% increase in cost sharing, prescription drug spending decreases by 2% to 6%, depending on class of drug and condition of the patient. The reduction in use associated with a benefit cap, which limits either the coverage amount or the number of covered prescriptions, is consistent with other cost-sharing features. For some chronic conditions, higher cost sharing is associated with increased use of medical services, at least for patients with congestive heart failure, lipid disorders, diabetes, and schizophrenia. While low-income groups may be more sensitive to increased cost sharing, there is little evidence to support this contention.ConclusionsPharmacy benefit design represents an important public health tool for improving patient treatment and adherence. While increased cost sharing is highly correlated with reductions in pharmacy use, the long-term consequences of benefit changes on health are still uncertain.Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disparities in Access to Essential New Prescription Drugs between Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanic WhitesMedical Care Research and Review, 2006
- Benefit Design And Specialty Drug UseHealth Affairs, 2006
- Drug Copayment and Adherence in Chronic Heart Failure: Effect on Cost and OutcomesPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2006
- Impact of two sequential drug cost-sharing policies on the use of inhaled medications in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthmaClinical Therapeutics, 2006
- When patients have to pay a share of drug costs: effects on frequency of physician visits, hospital admissions and filling of prescriptionsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- Estimating the price elasticity of expenditure for prescription drugs in the presence of non‐linear price schedules: an illustration from Quebec, CanadaHealth Economics, 2005
- A Copayment Increase for Prescription Drugs: The Long-Term and Short-Term Effects on Use and ExpendituresINQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 2005
- Impact of an Annual Dollar Limit or "Cap" on Prescription Drug Benefits for Medicare PatientsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2003
- Job-Based Health Benefits In 2002: Some Important TrendsHealth Affairs, 2002
- Are The Benefits Of Newer Drugs Worth Their Cost? Evidence From The 1996 MEPSHealth Affairs, 2001