Laparoscopic Colonic Resection
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Vol. 11 (6) , 401-408
- https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420152761932
Abstract
Background and Purpose: In the last decade, laparoscopy has dramatically changed colonic surgery. Laparoscopic procedures are applied to the treatment of almost all colonic diseases, including both benign and malignant lesions. Focusing our attention on the laparoscopic oncologic operative technique, we compared the perioperative results and the long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery (LS) with those of conventional open surgery (OS) in a series of 360 unselected consecutive patients. Patients and Methods: Between 1992 and 2001, excluding 102 patients with rectal tumors, 207 patients underwent laparoscopic colonic resection (72.5% for malignant lesions), whereas 153 (71.9% with malignant lesions) were treated by OS. The treatment modality was selected by the patients after reading the informed consent form. The statistical significance of differences in the morbidity and mortality rates, local recurrence rate, and incidence of distant metastases in the two groups was assessed by χ2 test. The survival probability analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Significant differences in survival probability between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. A level of 5% was used as the criterion of statistical significance. Results: Laparoscopic surgery was technically feasible in 95.7% of the patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in the major complication rate (3.5% after LS and 3.3% after OS; P = 0.870) or in perioperative mortality (1.5% v 1.3%; P = 0.769). The mean follow-up in the patients with malignant disease was 42.2 months, during which time, we observed 2 cases of abdominal wall metastases (1.9%) in patients with advanced disease. The local recurrence rate was lower after LS than OS: 2.8% v 8.1%; P = 0.223). Distant metastases occurred in 8.6% of patients after LS and 9.3% after OS (P = 0.926). At 48 months of follow-up, the cumulative survival probability in the LS-completed malignant group was 0.934 compared with 0.860 after OS (P = 0.781). Conclusion: Laparoscopic colonic resection for both benign and malignant lesions is technically feasible, without additional risks for the patients. However, oncologic outcomes have not been determined because no data from the ongoing randomized controlled trials are yet available.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Septic complications of elective laparoscopic colorectal resectionSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitisSurgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Accuracy and Safety of Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy: An Experimental Prospective Randomized StudyGynecologic Oncology, 1997
- Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection?Surgical Endoscopy, 1994