The Politics of Human-Embryo Research — Avoiding Ethical Gridlock
- 16 May 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (20) , 1329-1332
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199605163342012
Abstract
In late January 1996, President Bill Clinton signed a continuing resolution to keep the government open. Among other things, the resolution prohibits the use of federal funds for research on human embryos.1 This prohibition, which continues until September 30, the end of the current fiscal year, would become permanent if Congress reaffirms it and the President concurs.1 Compromise language to limit the prohibition to embryos created expressly for research purposes, but permitting federally funded research on “spare” embryos (those created for procreation but no longer needed) was defeated.2 A much stronger case can be made for using spare embryos in . . .Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- CON A Position Against Federal Funding for Human Embryo Research: Words of Caution for Women, for Science, and for SocietyJournal of Women's Health, 1995
- Awe DiminishedHastings Center Report, 1995
- The Politics of Transplantation of Human Fetal TissueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989