Planning Threatened: A Preliminary Report of Planners and Political Conflict
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Planning Education and Research
- Vol. 6 (2) , 99-107
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x8700600205
Abstract
The prospect of political conflict frequently threatens planners. Interviews with a sample of 60 Chicago planners indicates the incidence of job threatening political conflicts may be as high as one in two. In contrast, one in three admitted purposefully avoiding the danger of political disputes altogether. In describing efforts to prevent or cope with political conflict, planners reveal ambivalence about the expectations of their professional role and the uncertainties of political practice. For instance, winners usually claim victory based on professional prowess. Losers blame defeat on the power of their opponents. Despite the popularity of political avoidance and individual professionalism among planners, most agree they would like to know politically experienced colleagues to whom they could turn for advice when under attack. Planners may be willing to trade off some of the alleged virtue of professional autonomy for a bit of personal and practical solidarity.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Institutional Focus of Planning TheoryJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1985
- Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector: The Planner as MediatorJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1984
- Politics and Ambivalence In Planners' PracticeJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1983
- The Geography of Planning PracticeEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1983
- Some of What a Planner Knows A Case Study of Knowing-in-PracticeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1982
- Teaching Planning EthicsJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1981
- The Ethics of Contemporary American PlannersJournal of the American Planning Association, 1979