A comparison of replacement and reconstruction in patients with mitral regurgitation
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 93 (5) , 665-674
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36345-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Correlation of continuous wave doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: An experimental model of aortic stenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and Bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valvesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Thromboembolic risk and durability of the Hancock bioprosthetic cardiac valveEuropean Heart Journal, 1984
- Left ventricular performance after mitral reconstruction for mitral regurgitationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984
- Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasoundJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Twelve-year experience with glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine xenograftsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1982
- Assessment of prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgery for non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation.Heart, 1980
- The Angell-Shiley Porcine XenograftThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1979
- Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound.Circulation, 1979