The Use of Limit Theorems in Paired Comparison Model Building
- 1 September 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 32 (3) , 255-264
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289589
Abstract
The Thurstone and the Bradley-Terry models, both initially advanced on intuitive grounds, have proved useful in the analysis of paired comparisons. The psychological meaning of these models and their relation to one another is unclear, but they fit data. Stevens has observed that there may be two basic mechanisms of discrimination 1) additive and 2) substitutive. We advance two corresponding mathematical models: that experienced sensation is 1) the sum of a large number of independent signals and 2) the maximum of a large number of independent signals. These assumptions yield 1) Thurstone's model and 2) the model of Bradley-Terry. Psychological interpretations of the various parameters, in terms of sensation, present themselves in a natural manner. Thus this paper presents a theory which unifies and interprets two paired comparison models that have proved useful in fitting experimental data.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Metric for the Social ConsensusScience, 1966
- Another Interpretation of a Model for Paired ComparisonsPsychometrika, 1965
- Über die stochastische Fundierung des psychophysischen GesetzesBiometrische Zeitschrift, 1962
- Mathematical Models for Ranking from Paired ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1960
- A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.Psychological Review, 1960
- Statistics of ExtremesPublished by Columbia University Press ,1958
- On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review, 1957
- Some Statistical Methods in Taste Testing and Quality EvaluationBiometrics, 1953
- Sur La Distribution Limite Du Terme Maximum D'Une Serie AleatoireAnnals of Mathematics, 1943
- Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sampleMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1928