Safety of prolonging peripheral cannula and IV tubing use from 72 hours to 96 hours
- 28 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Infection Control
- Vol. 26 (1) , 66-70
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-6553(98)70063-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Factors for Infusion-related Phlebitis with Small Peripheral Venous CathetersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Prospective Study of Replacing Administration Sets for Intravenous Therapy at 48- vs 72-Hour IntervalsJAMA, 1987
- Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effectiveJAMA, 1987
- AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETERSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1983
- Complications of intravenous therapy with steel needles and Teflon® cathetersThe American Journal of Medicine, 1981
- INFUSION THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND INFECTION WITH VARIOUS CANNULASThe Lancet, 1975
- Indwelling Intravenous Polyethylene CathetersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1971
- Indwelling intravenous polyethylene catheters. Factors influencing the risk of microbial colonization and sepsisPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1971
- Risk of Local and Systemic Infection with Polyethylene Intravenous CathetersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1968