House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting: What Do Residents Want?
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in American Journal of Diseases of Children
- Vol. 145 (10) , 1104-1108
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160100036020
Abstract
• In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47%) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited. (AJDC. 1991;145:1104-1108)Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey of Residents' Attitudes Toward Reform of Work HoursArchives of Surgery, 1990
- The Moonlighting DilemmaPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Patient Care, Resident Stress, and Government RegulationArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1989
- The Libby Zion CaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Levels and causes of stress among residentsAcademic Medicine, 1987
- Debt, moonlighting, and career decisions among internal medicine residentsAcademic Medicine, 1987