“The Public Interest” in Administrative Decision-Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?.
- 1 June 1957
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 51 (2) , 346-368
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1952196
Abstract
Textbooks in public administration customarily conclude with a section on administrative responsibility. The charitable inference is that this location betokens the saving of the best till last, rather than the appendage of an afterthought. Herbert Kaufman might explain it as the preoccupation of the past generation of political scientists with the legitimation of the efficient exercise of administrative power to subserve the goals of the social state, with a consequent sublimation of the emerging problem of the control of large, professionalized bureaucracies. However that may be, it does seem clear that, with the exception of administrative decisions which adversely affect “civil liberties,” most political scientists have been content to let lawyers and defenders of the free enterprise system worry about the restraint of administrative action.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public AdministrationPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2017
- Public Policy and Administration: The Goals of Rationality and ResponsibilityPublic Administration Review, 1954
- Ethics for Policy Decision.The Philosophical Review, 1953
- Arthur F. Bentley's Political ScienceThe Western Political Quarterly, 1952
- The Process of GovernmentThe Western Political Quarterly, 1951
- Prolegomena to any Future Work on Majority RuleThe Journal of Politics, 1950
- The Fallacy of Absolute Majority RuleThe Journal of Politics, 1949
- Power and AdministrationPublic Administration Review, 1949
- Ethics and Administrative DiscretionPublic Administration Review, 1943
- Better Government PersonnelPolitical Science Quarterly, 1936