The Minimalist Organization as a Postbureaucratic Form
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management Inquiry
- Vol. 5 (2) , 140-154
- https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269652007
Abstract
This article explores the concept of the minimalist organization as the antithesis of the bureaucratic form. We argue that one inherent shortcoming of bureaucracy is the cost of hierarchical control; as a structure of control, it employs resources to support its compliance machinery, resources that could be used to create value. By contrast, we advance the concept of the minimalist organization as a form that economizes on compliance structures. We define the minimalist form in terms of its structural slightness and, through the example of Alcoholics Anonymous, identify its key dimensions: porous membership boundaries, lean administrative structure, nonhierarchical authority, and federalist governance. We use the example of Alcoholics Anonymous to explore the boundary conditions of the minimalist form. We conclude by considering its implications for our understanding of organizations in general.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Sobriety: The Cultural Significance of Alcoholics Anonymous as a Social MovementNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1994
- Philanthropic Dimensions of Mutual Benefit OrganizationsNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1994
- Can the “New Forms of Investment” Substitute for the “Old Forms?” A Transaction Costs PerspectiveJournal of International Business Studies, 1989
- Minimalist Organizations: Vital Events in State Bar Associations, 1870-1930American Sociological Review, 1987
- Structures of Organizational GovernanceHuman Relations, 1984
- The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Markets, Bureaucracies, and ClansAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and ChangeSocial Forces, 1966
- On The Meaning of AlienationAmerican Sociological Review, 1959
- Bureaucratic Structure and PersonalitySocial Forces, 1940