Advancing the scientific study of war
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Interactions
- Vol. 19 (1-2) , 1-26
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629308434817
Abstract
Although much research has been done, the scientific study of war has not progressed as rapidly as it could have due to a lack of integrative cumulation. To rectify this situation the war puzzle must be broken down into a series of interrelated research questions that fit within a process model of militarized interstate conflict. This will promote progress in explaining and predicting war, but the rarity of war, the role of chance in its genesis, and the possibility of multiple paths to war dictate that much patience, hard work, and imagination will be required to find the recipe(s) for war.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1992
- Dangerous DyadsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1992
- Territorial Changes and Militarized ConflictJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1988
- Changing Aspirations, Limited Attention, and WarWorld Politics, 1987
- Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Power Rivalries, 1816-1980The Journal of Politics, 1985
- Arms Races to War: Testing Some Empirical LinkagesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1985
- Toward a Scientific Understanding of International Conflict: A Personal ViewInternational Studies Quarterly, 1985
- Mirror, Mirror on the Wall...Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Arms Races and Escalation: A Closer LookJournal of Peace Research, 1983
- The contagiousness of coercion: The spread of serious international disputes, 1900–1976International Interactions, 1982