The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.
Open Access
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 61 (7) , 454-461
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.61.7.454
Abstract
The consistency of the major positive component (P100) of the full-field pattern-reversal response provides a clinically valuable and objective means of detecting visual field defects. Its normally symmetrical distribution about the midline of the occipital scalp results from the summation of two highly asymmetric half-field responses, each of which shows the positive component well lateralised with a widespread distribution on the ipsilateral side. Stimulation of each eye in patients with bitemporal and homonymous hemianopias results in two characteristic patterns of asymmetry, named 'crossed' and 'uncrossed' respectively, in which the major positivity is consistently recorded on the side ipsilateral to the preserved half field. Recordings from a patient after occipital lobectomy confirm the authors' previous suggestion that although the major positive component is recorded from the ipsilateral scalp the typical asymmetric half-field response is generated in the contralateral hemisphere.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuliElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976
- THE PATTERN-EVOKED POTENTIAL IN COMPRESSION OF THE ANTERIOR VISUAL PATHWAYSBrain, 1976
- A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked responseNature, 1976
- Visually evoked cortical potentials in the evaluation of homonymous and bitemporal visual field defects.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1976
- VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS SUSPECTED OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISBrain, 1975
- Visual Evoked Response in Diagnosis of Multiple SclerosisBMJ, 1973
- DELAYED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSE IN OPTIC NEURITISThe Lancet, 1972
- Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in manBrain Research, 1971
- The average visual response in patients with cerebrovascular diseaseElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1969
- Alterations of visual evoked response in the presence of homonymous visual defectsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1963