Structural Features of the Glutamate Binding Site in Recombinant NR1/NR2A N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptors Determined by Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Molecular Modeling
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Pharmacology
- Vol. 67 (5) , 1470-1484
- https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.008185
Abstract
We have used site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids located within the S1 and S2 ligand binding domains of the NR2A N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit to explore the nature of ligand binding. Wild-type or mutated NR1/NR2A NMDA receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two electrode voltage clamp. We investigated the effects of mutations in the S1 and S2 regions on the potencies of the agonists l-glutamate, l-aspartate, (R,S)-tetrazol-5yl-glycine, and NMDA. Mutation of each of the corresponding residues found in the NR2A receptor subunit, suggested to be contact residues in the GluR2 α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor subunit, caused a rightward shift in the concentration-response curve for each agonist examined. None of the mutations examined altered the efficacy of glutamate as assessed by methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium potentiation of agonist-evoked currents. In addition, none of the mutations altered the potency of glycine. Homology modeling and molecular dynamics were used to evaluate molecular details of ligand binding of both wild-type and mutant receptors, as well as to explore potential explanations for agonist selectivity between glutamate receptor subtypes. The modeling studies support our interpretation of the mutagenesis data and indicate a similar binding strategy for l-glutamate and NMDA when they occupy the binding site in NMDA receptors, as has been proposed for glutamate binding to the GluR2 AMPA receptor subunit. Furthermore, we offer an explanation as to why “charge conserving” mutations of two residues in the binding pocket result in nonfunctional receptor channels and suggest a contributing molecular determinant for why NMDA is not an agonist at AMPA receptors.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of a threonine residue in the S2 ligand binding domain in determining agonist potency and deactivation rate of recombinant NR1a/NR2D NMDA receptorsThe Journal of Physiology, 2004
- Mechanisms for Activation and Antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive Glutamate ReceptorNeuron, 2000
- Single‐channel analysis of an NMDA receptor possessing a mutation in the region of the glutamate binding siteThe Journal of Physiology, 2000
- Structural Insights Into NMDA Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors via Molecular ModellingJournal of Molecular Modeling, 2000
- Functional characterization of a potassium-selective prokaryotic glutamate receptorNature, 1999
- Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: The interpretation of structure‐activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptorsBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1998
- Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainateNature, 1998
- Identification of Amino Acid Residues of the NR2A Subunit That Control Glutamate Potency in Recombinant NR1/NR2A NMDA ReceptorsJournal of Neuroscience, 1998
- Cation-π Interactions in Chemistry and Biology: A New View of Benzene, Phe, Tyr, and TrpScience, 1996
- A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid receptors by glycine in mouse cultured hippocampal neurones.The Journal of Physiology, 1990