Problems in the Use of Large Data Sets to Assess Effectiveness
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 6 (2) , 211-219
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300000738
Abstract
Large data sets are an attractive source of information for outcome assessment, but their use involves certain problems and risks. Data base evaluations are retrospective and unblinded; they often represent the result of multiple analyses of multiple endpoints, and it is difficult to identify the procedures used and analytic choices made because critical details are often omitted. While data bases can suggest problems and offer answers, they cannot prove them; data base analyses must be followed by trials.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment-induced blood pressure reduction and the risk of myocardial infarctionJAMA, 1989
- Mortality and Reoperation after Open and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A comparison of randomized concurrent control groups with matched historical control groups: are historical controls valid?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.BMJ, 1985
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982