Resource Use After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Comparison Between Endovascular and Surgical Treatment
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 54 (5) , 1081-1088
- https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000119350.80122.43
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:. The aim of this study was to compare resource use after endovascular treatment and surgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.METKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommendations for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial AneurysmsStroke, 2002
- International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Outcomes of Early Endovascular Versus Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral AneurysmsStroke, 2000
- Impact of Guglielmi detachable coils on outcomes of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by a multidisciplinary team at a single institutionJournal of Neurosurgery, 2000
- Clinical and Angiographic Results of Endosaccular Coiling Treatment of Giant and Very Large Intracranial Aneurysms: A 7-year, Single-center ExperienceNeurosurgery, 1999
- Incidence of cerebral vasospasm after endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms: report on 69 casesJournal of Neurosurgery, 1997
- Hospital resource utilization in the treatment of cerebral aneurysmsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE: A Practical ScalePublished by Elsevier ,1975
- Therapeutic intervention scoring systemCritical Care Medicine, 1974