Evaluation of Compatibility Effects in the Precuing of Arm and Direction Parameters
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 61 (1) , 37-49
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1990.10607476
Abstract
The present study evaluated the role of compatibility effects in the precuing of arm and direction parameters. In the first two experiments different stimulus and response arrangements were examined. For all three experiments the spatial precue and imperative stimuli were compatibly assigned to responses (i.e., a direct correspondence existed between the stimulus and response locations). Experiments 1 and 2 indirectly tested the effect of decision processes required by the stimulus-response set. Experiment 1 replicated previous research that has found longer reaction times for the direction uncertain parameter as compared to arm uncertain. Experiment 2 examined the precuing of arm and direction parameters with stimuli that maintained right-left arrangements for both parameters. Unlike Experiment 1, reaction times did not differ for precuing the two movement parameters. Experiment 3 directly examined the effect of differential decision requirements from up-down spatial stimuli and right-left spatial stimuli for a single parameter. In support of results from the first two experiments, results indicated longer reaction times for decisions from up-down stimuli as compared to right-left stimuli. Because reaction times for precued movement parameters are a function of the stimulus and response arrangements used, differences in reaction times are most likely due to compatibility effects arising from differences in the spatial arrangements of the precued stimulus and response set.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?Perception & Psychophysics, 1988
- Influence of stimulus-response translations on response programming: Examining the relationship of arm, direction, and extent of movementActa Psychologica, 1986
- Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1986
- Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still presentPerception & Psychophysics, 1985
- Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1985
- Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibilityPerception & Psychophysics, 1984
- On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980
- Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980
- Precueing Response Factors in Choice Reaction TimeJournal of Motor Behavior, 1978