Field Comparison of Micropurging vs. Traditional Ground Water Sampling
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation
- Vol. 14 (4) , 183-190
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00496.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sampling Colloids and Colloid‐Associated Contaminants in Ground WaterGroundwater, 1993
- Passive sampling of groundwater monitoring wells without purging: multilevel well chemistry and tracer disappearanceJournal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1993
- Acquisition of Representative Ground Water Quality Samples for MetalsGround Water Monitoring & Remediation, 1992
- Suggested Modifications to Ground Water Sampling Procedures Based on Observations from the Colloidal BorescopeGround Water Monitoring & Remediation, 1992
- Metals in Ground Water: Sampling Artifacts and ReproducibilityHazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 1992
- Mass balance evaluation of monitoring well purging: Part I. Theoretical models and implications for representative samplingJournal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1991
- Naturally occurring arsenic in groundwaters of the midwestern United StatesEnvironmental Geology, 1991
- Multilayer Sampling in the Water‐Table Region of a Sandy AquiferGroundwater, 1991
- Groundwater sampling techniques for organic micropollutants: UK experienceQuarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 1989
- Monitoring Well Installation, Purging, and Sampling Techniques ‐ Part 1: ConceptualizationsGroundwater, 1987