Maternal opinion about analgesia in labour and delivery. A comparison of epidural blockade and intramuscular pethidine
- 28 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 34 (3) , 205-210
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(90)90072-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveriesEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1989
- Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothersBMJ, 1982
- EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA: THE INFLUENCE OF VOLUME AND CONCENTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE ON THE MODE OF DELIVERY, ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND MOTOR BLOCKBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1981
- Maternal opinion about analgesia for labourAnaesthesia, 1980
- LONG-TERM ASSESSMENT OF EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR THE RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOUR. II: SENSE OF “DEPRIVATION” AFTER EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOUR: RELEVANT OR NOT?British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1976
- A clinical evaluation of the maternal effects of lumbar extradural analgesia for labourAnaesthesia, 1974
- THE SECOND THOUSAND EPIDURAL BLOCKS IN AN OBSTETRIC HOSPITAL PRACTICEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1972
- SELECTIVE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AND THE FORCEPS RATEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1969