Comparative study between ultrasound, computed tomography, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of tumors of the liver
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Gastrointestinal Radiology
- Vol. 15 (1) , 102-106
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01888749
Abstract
Forty-one patients with liver tumor have been evaluated with ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in order to establish the accuracy of each technique. In group A (24 patients), in which all four imaging modalities were performed, our results show that MRI detected all hemangiomas (25/25) compared to 22/25, 21/25, and 20/25 with US, CT, and IA-DSA, respectively. No difference between the various methods was seen in the case of hepatoma. Finally, in the patients with metastases, all four techniques had the same sensitivity (100%) but the specificity of MRI was also 100%, compared to 33% for IA-DSA and 66% for US and CT.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differentiation of hepatic metastases from hepatic hemangiomas and cysts by using MR imagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Liver metastasis detection: comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning.Radiology, 1987
- Leo J. Rigler lecture. MR imaging of the liverAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1986
- Mass Lesions of the LiverMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1986
- Evaluation of focal hepatic masses: a comparative study of MRI and CTGastrointestinal Radiology, 1986
- Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.Radiology, 1985
- Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous hemangioma of the liver: tissue-specific characterizationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1985
- Hepatic tumors: magnetic resonance and CT appearance.Radiology, 1984
- Computed tomography and sonography of cavernous hemangioma of the liverAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983