COLLEGE STUDENTS’ REACTIONS TOWARDS KEY FACETS OF CLASSROOM TESTING
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Vol. 15 (2) , 151-169
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293900150206
Abstract
The major aim of the present study is to assess college students’ attitudes, perceptions, emotional reactions and affective dispositions with respect to various critical dimensions of course achievement testing and assessment, including: “papers” vs. “exams”, “essay” vs. “multiple choice” type formats, “open book” vs. “closed book” exams, “free choice” among items vs. “no free choice” among items, and “oral” vs. “written” modes of test administration. A further aim is to delineate the construction, properties, and potential classroom uses and applications of a selected sample of examinee feedback inventories designed to gauge students’ test attitudes and dispositions. The use of each examinee feedback inventory is demonstrated and exemplified in the context of an empirical study. This paper discusses the assumptions underlying the use of feedback systems in college achievement evaluation; their importance for assessing the face validity of classroom tests; some possible future applications of feedback inventories for research and applied purposes in college; and some guidelines for future research. A mapping sentence specifying the universe of content of test attitude and examinee feedback research is suggested as a heuristic device for guiding future research.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sociocultural Differences in Examinees' Attitudes Toward Scholastic Ability ExamsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988
- Essay versus Multiple-Choice Type Classroom Exams: The Student’s PerspectiveThe Journal of Educational Research, 1987
- Effects of decisional control on state anxiety and achievementPersonality and Individual Differences, 1987
- FACE VALIDITY REVISITEDJournal of Educational Measurement, 1985
- Does anxiety disrupt information processing or does poor information processing lead to anxiety?Applied Psychology, 1984
- Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychological Bulletin, 1973