Rebels with our Applause? A Critique of Resistance Theory in Paul Willis's Ethnography of Schooling
Open Access
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Education
- Vol. 167 (2) , 63-83
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748516700207
Abstract
The importance of conflict, contestation, and pupil resistance in schooling has been stressed in recent accounts of schooling's role in social reproduction. One of the most influential instances of this “resistance theory” of reproduction is Paul Willis's Learning to Labour, an ethnography of schooling. After some critical remarks about use of the term “resistance,” this paper analyzes Willis's ethnographic data and his presentation and interpretation are criticized for unduly romanticizing the “resistant” practices (or “counter-school culture”) of the subjects (“the lads”). Although Willis reveals the sexism, racism, and self-defeating manualism of “the lads,” he implicitly endorses educational and cultural notions which misrepresent the conditions for a progressive working-class education and for breaking the nexus between education and the reproduction of oppressive social structures. An alternative view of “resistance” is offered, in which the evaluation of nonconformist practices becomes a more socially relative and historically contingent issue.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: A Critical AnalysisHarvard Educational Review, 1983
- Epistemology and justifying the curriculum of educational studiesBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1982
- Resistance and Relative Autonomy Theories: problems of distortion and incoherence in recent Marxist analyses of educationBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1982
- From Reproduction to Transformation: recent radical perspectives on the curriculum from the USABritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1982
- Hegemony, resistance, and the paradox of educational reformInterchange, 1981
- Cultural production is different from cultural reproduction is different from social reproduction is different from reproductionInterchange, 1981
- Labor and Monopoly CapitalMonthly Review, 1974
- Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research ProgrammesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970