Two-Group Comparisons and Univariate Classification
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 43 (1) , 15-26
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448304300103
Abstract
An alternative analysis of the traditional two-group single response variable design is discussed. The proposed analysis involves the classification, or assignment, of experimental units to populations represented by the two groups. Methods of estimating probabilities of correct classification are discussed. Three real data sets are provided to illustrate the utility of a classification analysis in describing both group as well as individual differences. A table of sample sizes required to yield estimates of probabilities of correct classification within a given tolerance of optimum probabilities is presented. Operational definitions of "substantive significance" are proposed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- Confidence Intervals for the Conditional Probability of Misallocation in Discriminant AnalysisBiometrics, 1975
- A new tabulation of statistical procedures used in APA journals.American Psychologist, 1974
- On Expected Probabilities of Misclassification in Discriminant Analysis, Necessary Sample Size, and a Relation with the Multiple Correlation CoefficientPublished by JSTOR ,1968
- Relationship Between Per Cent Overlap and Measures of CorrelationEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1968
- An Almost Unbiased Method of Obtaining Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Misclassification in Discriminant AnalysisBiometrics, 1967
- Substantive significance of significant differences between two groups.Psychological Bulletin, 1967