An assessment of the sensitivity of three methods for the detection of rotavirus
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Virological Methods
- Vol. 16 (1-2) , 39-44
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0934(87)90029-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- CHINESE ADULT ROTAVIRUS IS A GROUP B ROTAVIRUSThe Lancet, 1985
- Rapid detection of enteric adenovirus and rotavirus: a simple method using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- FALSE POSITIVE ROTAZYME TESTS ON FAECAL SAMPLES FROM BABIESThe Lancet, 1983
- Isolation from Chickens of a Rotavirus Lacking the Rotavirus Group AntigenJournal of General Virology, 1981
- Comparison of electron microscopy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, solid-phase radioimmunoassay, and indirect immunofluorescence for detection of human rotavirus antigen in faeces.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA) FOR DETECTION OF HUMAN REOVIRUS-LIKE AGENT OF INFANTILE GASTROENTERITISThe Lancet, 1977
- DETECTION OF A NEW VIRUS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF FÆCAL EXTRACTS FROM CHILDREN WITH ACUTE GASTROENTERITISThe Lancet, 1974