Against ‘modernity’: a dissident rant
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Economy and Society
- Vol. 26 (1) , 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000001
Abstract
In the course of a critical analysis of some of the writings of Jurgen Habermas, Anthony Giddens,uart Hall, Steven Crook et al. and Zygmunt Bauman, the paper arugues that the term ‘modernity’ should have no place in the general sociological vocabulary. This is for three main reasons. First, having only recently ralzed that the term ‘captitalism’ hadn been allowed too wide a referent, it is a huge mistake to embrace as a substitue an equally over-extendedd term. Second, if the sociological use made of ‘capitalism’ carried a Eurocentrism, the use of ‘modernity’ carries an Amer-centrism that is as obvious aas it is unknown to most if its uders. Third, ignorance of the Amercan origins of the sociological usage of ‘modernity’ has led to mistaken accounts of the term's sociological genealogy and utter confusion as to the present nature of societies other than the United States, since there is no defensibel reason for referring to them as either ‘modern’ or ‘postmodern’.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sociology of Modernization and DevelopmentPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- 10.1515/9783110870343Crossref Listing of Deleted Dois, 2000
- Rethinking International RelationsPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1994
- The Global Political EconomyPublished by Project MUSE ,1988
- Marxism and the Crisis of Development in Prewar JapanPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1987
- The Sources of Social PowerPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- The Differentiation of SocietyPublished by Columbia University Press ,1982
- Modernity versus PostmodernityNew German Critique, 1981