Patient initiated outpatient follow up in rheumatoid arthritis: six year randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 16 November 2004
- Vol. 330 (7484) , 171
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38265.493773.8f
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether direct access to hospital review initiated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis would result in improved clinical and psychological outcome, reduced overall use of healthcare resources, and greater satisfaction with care than seen in patients receiving regular review initiated by a rheumatologist. Design Two year randomised controlled trial extended to six years. Setting Rheumatology outpatient department in teaching hospital. Participants 209 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis for over two years; 68 (65%) in the direct access group and 52 (50%) in the control group completed the study (P = 0.04). Main outcome measures Clinical outcome: pain, disease activity, early morning stiffness, inflammatory indices, disability, grip strength, range of movement in joints, and bone erosion. Psychological status: anxiety, depression, helplessness, self efficacy, satisfaction, and confidence in the system. Number of visits to hospital physician and general practitioner for arthritis. Results Participants were well matched at baseline. After six years there was only one significant difference between the two groups for the 14 clinical outcomes measured (deterioration in range of movement in elbow was less in direct access patients). There were no significant differences between groups for median change in psychological status. Satisfaction and confidence in the system were significantly higher in the direct access group at two, four, and six years: confidence 9.8 v 8.4, 9.4 v 8.0, 8.7 v 6.9; satisfaction 9.3 v 8.3, 9.3 v 7.7, 8.9 v 7.1 (all P < 0.02). Patients in the direct access group had 38% fewer hospital appointments (median 8 v 13, P < 0.0001). Conclusions Over six years, patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated their reviews through direct access were clinically and psychologically at least as well as patients having traditional reviews initiated by a physician. They requested fewer appointments, found direct access more acceptable, and had more than a third fewer medical appointments. This radical responsive management could be tested in other chronic diseases.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient‐initiated hospital follow‐up for rheumatoid arthritisRheumatology, 2000
- Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease: pragmatic randomised trial and cost effectiveness studyBMJ, 2000
- WHAT DO GENERAL PRACTITIONERS EXPECT FROM RHEUMATOLOGY CLINICS?Rheumatology, 1996
- Measuring disadvantage: changes in the underprivileged area, Townsend, and Carstairs scores 1981-91.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- WHICH PATIENTS SEE A RHEUMATOLOGIST?Rheumatology, 1991
- Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- A comparison of follow-up regimes in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1980
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980