A review of prospectively controlled comparisons of epidural with non-epidural forms of pain relief during labour
- 31 January 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
- Vol. 1 (2) , 93-110
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-289x(92)90008-r
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidural analgesia and maternal satisfaction.BMJ, 1991
- Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirthBMJ, 1990
- Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth.BMJ, 1990
- The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- MATERNAL PYREXIA ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOURThe Lancet, 1989
- The Oxford database of perinatal trials: Developing a register of published reports of controlled trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Perusing the literature: Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials databaseControlled Clinical Trials, 1985
- Risks and Benefits of Obstetric Epidural Analgesia: A ReviewBirth, 1985
- EFFECTS OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA ON THE NEWBORN: A SELECT, ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE CLINICIANClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981
- THE EFFECT OF LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON THE RATE OF CERVICAL DILATATION AND THE OUTCOME OF LABOUR OF SPONTANEOUS ONSETBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980