Rethinking Financial Regulation: How Confusions Have Prevented Progress
Preprint
- 20 October 2015
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The extreme fragility of the financial system that gives rise to systemic risk and crises is rooted in the incentives of people within this system and the failure of regulation to counter these incentives. The same forces that increase systemic risk also distort credit markets, exacerbate governance and control problems, and create opacity and inefficiencies. I discuss the flaws in existing capital regulations, including measurement issues, low equity levels, the risk-weighting system, and the use of debt-like hybrids such as Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLACs) as substitutes for equity. Regulatory reform efforts do not reflect lessons from the failure of past regulation. I also discuss briefly shadow banking and the politics of financial regulation. Confusions and flawed narratives have muddled the policy debate and, together with political forces, helped derail progress towards a safer and healthier financial system. . .Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Compelling Case for Stronger and More Effective Leverage Regulation in BankingThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2014
- Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and EconomicsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
- Does Debt Discipline Bankers? An Academic Myth About Bank IndebtednessSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Socially ExpensiveSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- The Parade of the Bankers’ New Clothes Continues: 44 Flawed Claims DebunkedSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- The Leverage Ratchet EffectSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013