Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Vol. 3, 25619
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00083
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous scientific studies over the past decade. However, the possibility to apply tDCS in therapy of neuropsychiatric disorders is still debated. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been approved for treatment of major depression in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tDCS is not as widely accepted. One of the criticisms against tDCS is the lack of spatial specificity. Focality is limited by the electrode size (35 cm2 are commonly used) and the bipolar arrangement. However, a current flow through the head directly from anode to cathode is an outdated view. Finite-element (FE) models have recently been used to predict the exact current flow during tDCS. These simulations have demonstrated that the current flow depends on tissue shape and conductivity. To face the challenge to predict the location, magnitude, and direction of the current flow induced by tDCS and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), we used a refined realistic FE modeling approach. With respect to the literature on clinical tDCS and tACS, we analyzed two common setups for the location of the stimulation electrodes which target the frontal lobe and the occipital lobe, respectively. We compared lateral and medial electrode configuration with regard to their usability. We were able to demonstrate that the lateral configurations yielded more focused stimulation areas as well as higher current intensities in the target areas. The high resolution of our simulation allows one to combine the modeled current flow with the knowledge of neuronal orientation to predict the consequences of tDCS and tACS. Our results not only offer a basis for a deeper understanding of the stimulation sites currently in use for clinical applications but also offer a better interpretation of observed effects.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speech Facilitation by Left Inferior Frontal Cortex StimulationCurrent Biology, 2011
- Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCSNeuroImage, 2011
- Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and sizeClinical Neurophysiology, 2010
- Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009
- Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular padBrain Stimulation, 2009
- Accuracy and run-time comparison for different potential approaches and iterative solvers in finite element method based EEG source analysisApplied Numerical Mathematics, 2009
- EEG source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1 mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head modelNeuroImage, 2009
- The Role of Oscillations and Synchrony in Cortical Networks and Their Putative Relevance for the Pathophysiology of SchizophreniaSchizophrenia Bulletin, 2008
- A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressionInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008
- Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulationClinical Neurophysiology, 2006