“Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trials
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 3 (4) , 345-353
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailabilityClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1980
- Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1980
- A Comparison of Amphotericin B Alone and Combined with Flucytosine in the Treatment of Cryptoccal MeningitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- When can 'non significantly different' treatments be considered as 'equivalent'?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1979
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The Use of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs in Comparative Bioavailability TrialsPublished by JSTOR ,1974
- Use of Confidence Intervals in Analysis of Comparative Bioavailability TrialsJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1972
- The role of hypothesis testing in clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1966
- Sodium Heparin vs Sodium Warfarin in Acute Myocardial InfarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1964
- IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypothesesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1933