Sulfate budget and a model for sulfate concentrations in stream water at Birkenes, a Small forested catchment in southernmost Norway
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 17 (2) , 377-389
- https://doi.org/10.1029/wr017i002p00377
Abstract
As part of the Norwegian SNSF project, the volume and chemical composition of precipitation and stream water have been measured for 6 years at Birkenes, a small (0.41 km2), gaged, coniferous‐forested catchment on granitic bedrock in southernmost Norway. Daily measurements of SO2 gas and SO4 aerosol have also been collected and provide the basis for estimation of dry deposition. The sulfate budget for the period November 1972 to October 1978 indicates that about 15% more sulfate left the catchment in runoff (7880 mg SO4 m−2 yr−1) than entered in dry (1870 mg SO4 m−2 yr−1) and wet (4970 mg SO4 m−2 yr−1) deposition. This difference is probably not significantly different from zero, given the difficulties inherent in the measurements. The input‐output budget reveals a marked seasonal pattern (accumulation during summer and winter; washout during spring and autumn). The annual sulfate flux is perhaps 5–10 times larger than natural. The result is an acidification of stream water and an increased leaching of base cations from the soil. The concentration of sulfate in stream water at Birkenes shows a characteristic pattern of high levels (10–13 mg l−1) in the first stormflow following a dry summer period and low levels (∼ 5 mg l−1) in baseflow. For the summer half‐year we have simulated sulfate concentrations using a simple two‐compartment model. Sulfate is assumed to accumulate in the uppermost soil layers because of dry deposition and evapotranspiration of rainwater. Mineralization of other sulfur compounds is included indirectly. In the lower mineral soil layers, adsorption/desorption of sulfate is assumed to occur. The ability of this simple model to simulate sulfate concentrations in stream water suggests that the model quantitively accounts for these processes.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- SULFATE ADSORPTION AND SULFUR FRACTIONS IN A HIGHLY WEATHERED SOIL UNDER A MIXED DECIDUOUS FORESTSoil Science, 1979
- Dry and wet removal of sulphur from the atmosphereAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1978
- The input of gaseous and particulate sulfur to a forest ecosystemTellus, 1978
- Sulfur Distribution and Cycling in a Deciduous Forest WatershedJournal of Environmental Quality, 1978
- A simple formula for estimating evaporation rates in various climates, using temperature data aloneAgricultural Meteorology, 1977
- Atmospheric sulfate additions and cation leaching in a Douglas fir ecosystemWater Resources Research, 1977
- Natural Water and Chemical Budgets for a Small Precambrian Lake Basin in Central CanadaJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1976
- Accuracy of soil water budgets based on a range of relationships for the influence of soil water availability on actual water useAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1975
- A simpler empirical expression for actual evapotranspiration rates — a discussionAgricultural Meteorology, 1973
- Free Acid in British SoilsNature, 1958