Carotid Compression Tonography
- 1 May 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 6 (3) , 257-262
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.6.3.257
Abstract
One hundred twenty-two patients had carotid compression tonography (CCT) followed by bilateral carotid arteriography. In the group (82 patients) which was felt to have significant occlusive disease of the internal carotid at the level of the carotid bifurcation (>50% stenosis), the CCT showed a 92% correlation with arteriography. Of the group (48 patients) that underwent endarterectomy, there was a 94% correlation with CCT testing. In 40 patients, with normal arteriograms or with less than 50% stenotic lesions on arteriography, there was a large number (25%) of patients with a CCT test which appeared to indicate decreased flow. Various reasons for this are discussed. The high correlation of the CCT test and carotid arteriography in the patients with surgically amenable lesions would suggest that the CCT test is a good noninvasive screening technique for the detection of significant occlusive disease of the extracranial carotid vascular system.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noninvasive Detection and Evaluation of Carotid Occlusive DiseaseArchives of Surgery, 1973
- Results of Carotid Compression Tonographic test in Carotid and Vertebrobasilar OcclusionAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1972
- Joint Study of Extracranial Arterial OcclusionJAMA, 1968
- Carotid-Compression Tomographic TestAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1966
- Death Following Digital CarotidArchives of Neurology, 1963
- Simultaneous determinations of retinal and carotid artery pressuresNeurology, 1960
- Ophthalmodynamometry and Intracranial Vascular DiseaseMedical Clinics of North America, 1958
- BILATERAL THROMBOSIS OF ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY FOLLOWING STIMULATION OF A HYPERACTIVE CAROTID SINUSPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1941
- THE OCULAR CIRCULATION: ITS NORMAL PRESSURE RELATIONSHIPS AND THEIR PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCEBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1926