The impact of fluctuations in intensity patterns on the number of monitor units and the quality and accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy
- 6 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1226-1237
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.599000
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to examine the potential impact of the frequency and amplitude of fluctuations ("complexity") in intensity distributions on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) dose distributions. The intensity-modulated beams are efficiently delivered using a multileaf collimator (MLC). Radiation may be delivered through a continuous (dynamic mode) or discrete (step-and-shoot) sequence of windows formed by the leaves. Algorithms and software that convert optimized intensity distributions into leaf trajectories apply approximate empirical corrections to account for the various effects associated with MLC characteristics, such as the rounded leaf tips, tongue-and-groove leaf design, leaf transmission, leaf scatter, and collimator scatter upstream from the MLC. Typically, the difference between inter- and intraleaf transmissions is ignored. In this paper, using a schematic example of IMRT for head and neck carcinomas, we demonstrate that complex anatomy and severe optimization constraints produce complex intensity patterns. Using idealized intensity patterns we also demonstrate that, for complex intensity patterns, the average window width tends to be smaller and, for the same dose received by the tumor, the number of MUs is larger. We found that as the complexity increases, so does the contribution of radiation transmitted through and scattered from the leaves ("indirect radiation") to the total delivered dose. As a consequence, the lowest deliverable intensity in complex intensity patterns may be significantly greater than that required to provide adequate protection for some normal tissues. Furthermore, since corrections for leaf transmission and scatter effects are approximate and the difference between inter- and intraleaf transmission is ignored, the accuracy of the delivered dose may be affected. Using the results of a simple experiment and a typical intensity-modulated beam for a head and neck case as examples, we show the effect of window width and complexity on the accuracy and deliverability of intensity patterns. Some possible strategies for improving the accuracy and for relaxing the lower limit on deliverable intensity are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization systemMedical Physics, 2000
- Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segmentsMedical Physics, 1998
- An optimized leaf-setting algorithm for beam intensity modulation using dynamic multileaf collimatorsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1998
- Dosimetric verification of intensity‐modulated fieldsMedical Physics, 1996
- The influence of scatter on the design of optimized intensity modulationsMedical Physics, 1995
- Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimationRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1994
- Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimatorsMedical Physics, 1994
- X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimatorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributionsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimationPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1992