A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Vol. 46 (4) , 529-546
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spiraling Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Women's Health Behaviors: A Double Helix Model for Mixed MethodsQualitative Health Research, 2008
- A mix-method approach to the cultural understanding of distress and the non-use of mental health servicesJournal of Mental Health, 2007
- Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studiesSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Designing A Mixed Methods Study In Primary CareAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ, 2000
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993
- Research synthesis reviews: an illustrated critique of “hidden” judgments, choices, and compromisesClinical Psychology Review, 1987