Evaluating the Benefits from Health Research and Development Centres
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation
- Vol. 6 (2) , 137-160
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209181
Abstract
The most appropriate criteria and the best approach for evaluating centres concerned with research into health and health services, are matters of academic and policy debate. There is interest in assessing the impact made by research on policy and practice as well as using more traditional peer review of the knowledge produced. In this context the article describes the development of a multidimensional categorization of benefits, or payback, from research and development (R&D) and a model for conducting evaluations of impact. This categorization and model were used during an assessment of two R&D centres funded by a regional office of the National Health Service in the UK. The acceptability of such an approach is discussed in the light of relevant proposals from other authors, changes in the nature of knowledge production and the consequent role of multiple stakeholders.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980sPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Writing Performative History:Social Studies of Science, 1998
- Moderation of Policy-Making?Evaluation, 1998
- Assessing the Framework ProgrammesEvaluation, 1995
- Indirect Costs in Economic StudiesPharmacoEconomics, 1993
- Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordinationInternational Organization, 1992
- Performance Measurement in Public Sector ServicesPolicy & Politics, 1986
- If Dissemination Is the Solution, What Is the Problem ?Knowledge, 1980
- Knowledge Creep and Decision AccretionKnowledge, 1980
- The Many Meanings of Research UtilizationPublic Administration Review, 1979