Vaccination with Ep-CAM Protein or Anti-Idiotypic Antibody Induces Th1-Biased Response against MHC Class I- and II-Restricted Ep-CAM Epitopes in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients
Open Access
- 15 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (16) , 5391-5402
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0425
Abstract
Purpose: The tumor-associated antigen Ep-CAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) is overexpressed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant Ep-CAM protein and a human anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-Id) mimicking Ep-CAM. Experimental Design: Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II–IV CRC without remaining macroscopic disease received intradermal/subcutaneous injections of Ep-CAM (400 μg/dose; n = 7) or anti-Id (500 μg/dose; n = 6) at weeks 0, 2, and 6 in combination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (75 μg/day, for 4 consecutive days). Results: Adverse reactions were mild (grade I–II). All patients immunized with the Ep-CAM protein produced Ep-CAM–specific IgG antibodies, predominantly IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses, whereas no humoral response was induced by the anti-Id vaccine. All patients, with one exception in each group, mounted an Ep-CAM–specific proliferative T-cell response. The immune response was more rapid, potent, and protracted after Ep-CAM in comparison with anti-Id vaccination. Interferon-γ-secreting cells (ELISPOT) were detected in both immunization groups against the Ep-CAM protein as well as various Ep-CAM–derived MHC class I- and II-restricted peptides. Flow cytometry analysis showed that Ep-CAM–specific interferon-γ- and perforin-producing cells predominantly resided within CD8+CD56− and CD8dimCD56+ T cells. Conclusions: Ep-CAM protein in combination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor induced a long-lasting, Th1-biased humoral and cellular immune response compared with anti-Id. Ep-CAM–specific T cells and natural killer-like T cells responding in a MHC class I- and II-restricted manner were also induced. Vaccination with Ep-CAM protein may warrant further investigation as a novel therapeutic approach to CRC.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antigen‐specific immunotherapy and cancer vaccinesInternational Journal of Cancer, 2003
- The Regulatory Role of Vα14 NKT Cells in Innate and Acquired Immune ResponseAnnual Review of Immunology, 2003
- Clinical implications of antigen transfer mechanisms from malignant to dendritic cellsExperimental Hematology, 2002
- γδ T cells: functional plasticity and heterogeneityNature Reviews Immunology, 2002
- Gamma Interferon Expression in CD8+T Cells Is a Marker for Circulating Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes That Recognize an HLA A2-Restricted Epitope of Human Cytomegalovirus Phosphoprotein pp65Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2001
- CORRELATION OF HUMAN CD56+CELL CYTOTOXICITY AND IFN-γ PRODUCTIONCytokine, 2001
- Identification of Potential HLA-A *0201 Restricted CTL Epitopes Derived from the Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (Ep-CAM) and the Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)Human Immunology, 1997
- Structural and functional properties of HIV-1GER TAR sequencesJournal of Biomedical Science, 1996
- Immune-mediated side-effects of cytokines in humansToxicology, 1995
- Human Immunoglobulin G and Immunoglobulin G Subclasses: Biochemical, Genetic, and Clinical AspectsCritical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 1989