Choice versus sensitivity: Party reactions to public concerns
- 22 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Political Research
- Vol. 43 (6) , 845-868
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00177.x
Abstract
Abstract. Most discussions of democratic theory assume that parties should offer clear choices to voters but also show themselves sensitive to public concerns. Under certain circumstances, however, party convergence on these may preclude electoral choice, thus creating conflict between two democratic ‘goods’. We examine possible tradeoffs between choice and responsiveness, and see which actually occur in 16 postwar democracies. Party policy positions turn out to be more strongly related to party ideology than popular concerns, thus privileging differentiation and choice over sensitivity and responsiveness. Implications for democratic theory and practice are considered.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping Policy PreferencesPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Expert judgements of party policy positions: uses and limitations in political researchEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2000
- Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos DataAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2000
- Dynamic RepresentationAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Why Parties?Published by University of Chicago Press ,1995
- What Moves Public Opinion?American Political Science Review, 1987
- THE POLITICS OF MANIFESTOSParliamentary Affairs, 1981
- Electoral Choice and Popular Control of Public Policy: The Case of the 1966 House ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1972