Evidence That Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is a Part of a Firm's Overall Disclosure Package*
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Accounting Research
- Vol. 16 (1) , 111-134
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00576.x
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the role, if any, that management discussion and analysis (MD&A) plays in a firm's disclosure package. First, we present evidence regarding the usefulness of MD&A. Our evidence is uniformly supportive of the view that MD&A is a source of new and useful information and indicates that MD&A is used for financial analysis purposes by at least one significant user group, sell‐side analysts, who are members of the Toronto Society of Financial Analysts. We then provide evidence on disclosure quality. The results reveal that, overall, MD&A disclosure quality varies with disclosure stimuli similar to those found to influence disclosure choice in other disclosure channels. However, a more refined analysis of the MD&A subcomponents reveals that different factors influence disclosure quality for those subcomponents. Taken together, our results are consistent with the notion that MD&A is a part of a firm's overall disclosure package.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- MD&A Quality as Measured by the SEC and Analysts' Earnings Forecasts*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1999
- The Voluntary Inclusion of Forecasts in the MD&A Section of Annual Reports*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1994
- Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate DisclosuresJournal of Accounting Research, 1993
- The Management of Corporate Financial Disclosure: Opportunism, Ritualism, Policies, and ProcessesJournal of Accounting Research, 1990
- The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing, and Auditors on Voluntary Disclosure in Corporate Annual ReportsAccounting and Business Research, 1979