URBAN GROWTH COALITIONS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY: POSTWAR GROWTH AND THE POLITICS OF ANNEXATION IN METROPOLITAN COLUMBUS
- 15 May 1991
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Urban Geography
- Vol. 12 (3) , 197-225
- https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.12.3.197
Abstract
The "political economy of place" has emerged as an important theme in urban research in recent years. Within this theme, scholars have highlighted the role of so-called urban growth coalitions in the creation of conditions favorable for urban economic development. Among their activities, growth coalitions may be interested in jurisdictional organization and, in particular, municipal annexation. This paper examines the conditions that have facilitated annexation as a postwar growth policy in metropolitan Columbus, Ohio, and the role of urban growth coalitions in shaping the policy. The policy has been effective to the extent that annexation to Columbus for municipal purposes has not included decisions on the transfer of school district territory.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cities in pursuit of economic growthPolitical Geography Quarterly, 1990
- Locality and Community in the Politics of Local Economic DevelopmentAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1988
- The Goals and Strategies of Local Boundary Changes: Government Organization or Private Gain?Journal of Urban Affairs, 1986
- Tensions in the Growth Machine: Overcoming Resistance to Value-Free DevelopmentSocial Problems, 1984
- A Theory of Local AutonomyAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1984
- Race, Class and the State: the Metropolitan Enclave System in the United StatesInsurgent Sociologist, 1980
- Jurisdictional fragmentation in the American metropolis: alternative perspectivesInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1980
- The Post-War Politics of Urban DevelopmentPolitics & Society, 1975
- Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolutionRegional Studies, 1974
- A Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresJournal of Political Economy, 1956