Confidence Limits for Low Induced Frequencies of Oncogenic Transformation in the Presence of a Background
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Vol. 57 (5) , 1031-1045
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009014551141
Abstract
The problem is addressed of assessing realistic confidence limits for oncogenic transformation rates when the incidence of transformation is small, and there is a background present. It is shown that the commonly used approximations for assessing the confidence interval on the radiation-induced transformation rate (t1) and the control rate (t2) are inadequate when only a small number of transformants are observed. Accurate techniques are described for these cases for the estimation of confidence limits of t1, t2 and also t1-t2.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neutron-Energy-Dependent Oncogenic Transformation of C3H 10% 1/2 Mouse CellsRadiation Research, 1989
- Lack of Inverse Dose-rate Effect on Fission Neutron Induced Transformation of C3H/10T1/2 CellsInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1988
- ANOTHER SHORTCUT METHOD FOR CALCULATING THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF A POISSON VARIABLE (OR OF A STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIO)American Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- A third order iterative procedure for computing exact confidence limits for poisson expectation valuesComputers and Biomedical Research, 1983
- Fission-spectrum neutrons at reduced dose rates enhance neoplastic transformationNature, 1982
- Oncogenic transformation of mammalian cells in vitro with split doses of x-rays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979
- Radiation induced chromosome aberrations and the poisson distributionRadiation and Environmental Biophysics, 1979
- The Logic of Inductive InferenceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1935
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934
- A note on inverse probabilityMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1932