Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 18 (4) , 411-436
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499048
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- Are Twelve Heads Better than One?Law and Contemporary Problems, 1989
- Cos Cob Press and the American ComposerNotes, 1988
- Oil keeps fallingNature, 1986
- On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- The Calderon-Zygmund Decomposition on Product DomainsAmerican Journal of Mathematics, 1982
- Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury InstructionsLaw & Society Review, 1982
- Effects of Inadmissible Evidence and Level of Judicial Admonishment to Disregard on the Judgments of Mock Jurors1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral DilemmaJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973
- Voluntary Control of Smooth Eye Movements and their VelocityNature, 1972