Use of clinic versus private family planning care by low-income women: access, cost, and patient satisfaction.
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 79 (6) , 692-697
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.79.6.692
Abstract
Use of private physicians versus public family planning facilities by poverty level and near poverty level women was examined by means of a sample survey conducted in low-income areas of Los Angeles County [U.S.A.]. Utilization differed by race/ethnicity, with Hispanics more likely to go to federally subsidized family planning clinics (primarily county-run), Whites and Blacks to privat e physicians. Private family planning offers easier access, greater convenience, and higher satisfaction, albeit at almost double the cost. Clinic usage is influenced by lack of a regular source of medical car and lack of insurance coverage more than poverty level per se. Clinic patients report greater patient education regarding contraceptive methods, but less general medical care during clinic visits. They are more likely than private patients to expess a desire for a different source of family planning care.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers to Contraceptive ServicesFamily Planning Perspectives, 1987
- Health Status and Medical Care UtilizationHealth Affairs, 1987
- Source of service and visit rate for family planning services: United States, 1982.1986
- The Availability of Reproductive Health Services from U.S. Private PhysiciansFamily Planning Perspectives, 1985
- Family Planning Clinic Services in the United States, 1983Family Planning Perspectives, 1985
- 1981 Summary: National Ambulatory Medical Care SurveyPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1983