Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Tourism Geographies
- Vol. 2 (1) , 87-107
- https://doi.org/10.1080/146166800363466
Abstract
In contrast with developing countries, where the study of circulation occupies a central position, the literature on temporary mobility in the developed world is sparse and unsystematic. This paper examines reasons for this fragmentation and endeavours to situate tourism within the wider context of temporary and permanent population movements. It is suggested that temporary moves have three distinctive dimensions - duration, frequency and seasonality - which present a formidable methodological challenge. Despite this, it is argued that both forms of movement can be usefully classified under production-related and consumption-related headings. Against this framework we explore similarities and differences in the intensity, composition and spatial patterns of temporary and permanent moves using data from the Australian population Census. The findings point to processes of complementarity and substitution which underline the interconnectedness of different forms of mobility at the individual and aggregate levels across space and through time.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migrationTourism Geographies, 2000
- Understanding the 1996 census migration dataJournal of the Australian Population Association, 1998
- Patterns of Temporary Mobility in Australia: Evidence from the 1991 CensusAustralian Geographical Studies, 1998
- WHICH POPULATION?Australian Planner, 1998
- How often do australians move? alternative measures of population mobilityJournal of the Australian Population Association, 1996
- WHEN A RESIDENCE IS NOT A HOUSE: EXAMINING RESIDENCE-BASED MIGRATION DEFINITIONSThe Professional Geographer, 1982