Auditing Research Studies
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Nursing Research
- Vol. 49 (2) , 117-120
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200003000-00009
Abstract
Background: Recognizing the increasing attention being given to reports of misconduct, fraud, and unethical behavior in biomedical research, it appears timely for nurse researchers to engage in an organized method of peer review. Objectives: To describe an auditing process for funded research grants, the guidelines used to conduct the research audit, and the results to date. Methods: The audit encompassed National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded projects and their respective research teams, 12 faculty auditors using an audit worksheet developed by the Center for Nursing Research. Results: Overall, auditing of research grants was viewed positively by both investigators and faculty auditors. Minor problems were identified that could be corrected. Only one grant required a second review. Conclusions: Specific guidelines are proposed for future audits that include level of funding and timing of audits.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The code of silenceThe Lancet, 1997
- washington US genome chief withdraws five papers over fraudThe Lancet, 1996
- The National Cancer Institute Audit of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Reanalysis and Results after 12 Years of Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy with Lumpectomy with or without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Fraud, Irresponsible Authorship, and Their CausesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Report Absolves Harvard in Case of FakeryScience, 1982