Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section
Open Access
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 47 (3) , 199-201
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02117.x
Abstract
An evaluation of a 30 gauge spinal needle in a combined epidural/spinal anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section revealed a 25% failure rate of the spinal element. In this unit, no more than 4% of spinal anaesthetics might be expected to fail. One of the reasons for the higher failure rate was that, when using the Tuohy needle as an introducer, the dura was not identified. This prompted us to compare the ‘hrough‐the‐ Tuohy’ or needle within needle approach for combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia, with a technique that involved siting the epidural and spinal sequentially in separate spaces. One hundred women requiring elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomised into single or double space groups. The technique failed in 16% of through‐the‐needle cases, and in 4% of sequential sitings. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section is more successful if each procedure is performed using separate spaces.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean sectionAnaesthesia, 1990
- EXTRADURAL, SPINAL OR COMBINED BLOCK FOR OBSTETRIC SURGICAL ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- Incidence and Prediction of Postdural Puncture Headache A Prospective Study of 1021 Spinal AnesthesiasAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990
- Postdural puncture headache A comparison between 26‐ and 29‐gauge needles in young patientsAnaesthesia, 1989
- Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean sectionActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1988
- LOCAL ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES IN OBSTETRICSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1986
- Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniquesAnaesthesia, 1982
- Epidural and subarachnoid analgesia for elective Caesarean sectionAnaesthesia, 1981
- EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION: A Review of 182 CasesBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1973