Why So Much Error in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts?
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in CFA Magazine
- Vol. 54 (6) , 35-42
- https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v54.n6.2223
Abstract
Wall Street analysts tend to be too optimistic about the earnings prospects of companies they follow. The average consensus 12-month EPS growth forecast is 17.7 percent, which is more than twice the actual growth rate. In aggregate, forecasts are 11.2 percent above actual earnings at the start of a year and are revised downward continuously in the course of the year. For the full study period reported here, the percentage of 12-month earnings estimates revised downward exceeded the percentage revised upward, on average, by 4.4 percent every month. Since 1993, however, the quality of analyst forecasts seems to have improved. This article provides an intuitive explanation of the change and suggests ways in which analysts can use the explanation to improve portfolio performance.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications of Herding Behavior for Earnings Estimation, Risk Assessment, and Stock ReturnsCFA Magazine, 1996
- Analyst Forecasting Errors and Their Implications for Security AnalysisCFA Magazine, 1995
- Falling in Love Again—Analysts’ Estimates and RealityCFA Magazine, 1994
- Using Earnings Estimates for Global Asset AllocationCFA Magazine, 1994
- Analysts' Decisions As Products of a Multi-Task EnvironmentJournal of Accounting Research, 1993