Anthropometric comparison of mentally retarded males with and without the fragile X syndrome
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics
- Vol. 38 (2-3) , 260-268
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320380220
Abstract
An anthropometric survey of 41 variables (weight, height, 10 linear, 4 breadth, 22 craniofacial, 2 skinfold, and testicular volume), including multivariate discriminant analysis, was undertaken on 110 mentally retarded males (39 with and 71 without the fra(X) syndrome). The mean Z scores of the fra(X) syndrome males fell between ‐ 2.00 and 8.38 for bizygomatic diameter and testicular volume, respectively, and the range of the mean Z scores of the non‐fra(X) males was from ‐ 2.64 to 2.26 for hand breadth and testicular volume, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (P < .05) between fra(X) and non‐fra(X) males for 18 measurements (weight, height, 7 linear, 2 breadth, 5 craniofacial, 1 skinfold, and testicular volume), with the greater measurements (excluding bizygomatic diameter) found in fra(X) males. Sitting height, knee‐buttock length, middle finger length, and hand length were negatively correlated (P < .05) with age, whereas bizygomatic diameter, ear length, and ear width were positively correlated (P < .05) with age and head circumference, head length, and outer canthal distance were positively correlated (P < .05) with fra(X) chromosome expression in the fra(X) males. Triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were negatively correlated (P < .05) with age, whereas ankle breadth, ear length, ear width, and nose length were positively correlated (P < .05) in the non‐fra(X) males. Discriminant analysis of 34 fra(X) and 71 non‐fra(X) males resulted in a discriminant function based on 6 of 17 anthropometric variables and age. In the discriminant analysis, patients with the fra(X) syndrome were distinguished from mentally retarded males without the fra(X) syndrome at an overall correct classification rate of 97.1% in our sample. The 6 anthropometric variables in the discriminant function were the Z scores representing testicular volume, ear width, head breadth, bizygomatic diameter, hand breadth, and hand length. Additional research is needed to test the usefulness of these variables in screening mentally retarded males for the fra(X) syndrome.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency of rare fragile sites among mentally subnormal schoolchildrenClinical Genetics, 2008
- Metacarpophalangeal pattern profile analysis in fragile X syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988
- Anthropometry in Martin‐Bell syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988
- Frequency of the fragile X syndrome in infantile autismClinical Genetics, 1985
- Fragile X in a Survey of 75 Autistic MalesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- An anthropometric study of males with the Fragile‐X syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1984
- The fragile X syndrome II: Preliminary data on growth and development in malesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1984
- Screening of mentally retarded males for macro-orchidism and the fragile X chromosomeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1983
- Revised standards for triceps and subscapular skinfolds in British children.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1975