The safety and efficacy of intra-nasal ethmoidectomy
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
- Vol. 102 (9) , 802-804
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100106504
Abstract
Each of the three types of ethmoidectomy: intra-nasal, trans-antral and external, has its supporters and detractors who argue about the efficacy and safety of the procedures. One hundred and five ethmoidec-tomies for nasal polyps are reviewed retrospectively. Regardless of the approach used, approximately half of these had recurrence of polyps and some patients had several revision operations. There were six complications specific to the surgery. None was serious but most occurred with external ethmoidectomy. The limitations of ethmoidectomy for nasal polyps, the reasons for the good safety record and the best means of training juniors in the procedures are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microscopic Sinus Surgery, Transnasal Ethmoidectomy and SphenoidectomyThe Laryngoscope, 1983
- The Intranasal Ethmoidectomy: A 12‐Year PerspectiveOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1982
- Letter to the editor: Dear KarlThe Laryngoscope, 1982
- The middle turbinate and its relationship to the ethmoidal labyrinth and the orbitThe Laryngoscope, 1982
- Rare complications following ethmoidectomies: A report of eleven casesThe Laryngoscope, 1981
- Medial Rectus Injury From Intranasal SurgeryArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1979
- Ocular Motility Complications Following Intranasal SurgeryArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1979
- Complications of intranasal ethmoidectomy: A review of 1,000 consecutive operationsThe Laryngoscope, 1979