The cytoarchitecture of the torus semicircularis in the golden skinkMabuya multifasciata

Abstract
The skink, Mabuya multifasciata, torus semicircularis was subdivided into the central (CN), the laminar (LN), and the superficial (SN) nuclei using Golgi and Nissl methods. The central nucleus consisted of small ovoid neurons surrounding a core of fewer large ovoid‐triangular and fusiform neurons. The ovoid cells had scant cytoplasm and two to five dendritic trunks. Most of these processes were directed around the periphery of the central nucleus. The large neurons had clumped, darkly staining Nissl substance and a central nucleus. The sparse dendritic spine population on these cells increased distally on the three to five radiate dendrites. The laminar nucleus was present caudal and ventral to the central nucleus. At more rostral levels it was medial and dorsomedial to the central nucleus. The NL had three to five layers of ovoid and fusiform neurons. Scattered within these layers were a few ovoid‐triangular neurons. Ovoid neurons had eccentric or central nuclei. The arborization of their dendrites was generally medial and lateral but was frequently oriented caudomedial and rostrolateral. Fusiform neurons had pale Nissl substance, central nuclei, and one to two dendritic processes. The ovoid‐triangular neurons had dense, clumped Nissl substance and at least two dendritic trunks with few spines. The superficial nucleus was dorsal, lateral, and caudal to the central nucleus. Extending ventrolaterally around the central nucleus, the superficial nucleus became confluent with the laminar nucleus, ensheathing the central nucleus ventrally, laterally, and dorsally. Rostrally the central nucleus was covered by the layers of the laminar nucleus. Within the superficial nucleus were ovoid, fusiform and sparse ovoid‐triangular neurons. The study indicated that the morphology of the torus semicircularis in the golden skink was similar to that in other lizards. This similarity correlates with the degree of development as it relates to the auditory function, but was independent of the type of inner ear restraint mechanism.