Descriptiveness and Proper Name Retrieval
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Memory
- Vol. 6 (2) , 199-206
- https://doi.org/10.1080/741942072
Abstract
Cohen (1990) hypothesised that the retrieval of proper names is particularly difficult because proper names convey little information about their bearers' attributes. In the present study, this hypothesis was evaluated by using a face naming task. Faces were those of cartoon and comic-strip characters bearing either arbitrary names or descriptive names. Results unequivocally showed that retrieval blocks occurred more often in naming characters bearing arbitrary names than in naming characters bearing descriptive names. Moreover, retrieving arbitrary names that were also common names was as difficult as retrieving arbitrary names that were not common names. These results support Cohen's claim that arbitrariness plays a significant role in the relative vulnerability of proper name retrieval.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some Mickey Mouse experiments: An examination of the classification and naming of individual thingsBritish Journal of Psychology, 1994
- Testing the models? New data and commentary on Stanhope & Cohen (1993)British Journal of Psychology, 1994
- Who primed Roger Rabbit? An investigation of priming between individual itemsBritish Journal of Psychology, 1994
- The difficulty with recalling people's names: The plausible phonology hypothesisMemory, 1993
- Retrieval failures in face namingMemory, 1993
- Memory for proper names: A reviewMemory, 1993
- Proper Name AnomiaCortex, 1992
- Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressionsNature, 1989
- Generating proper names: A case of selective inabilityCognitive Neuropsychology, 1988
- Putting names to facesBritish Journal of Psychology, 1987